Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
South African Journal of Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

South African Journal of Geology; December 2008; v. 111; no. 4; p. 462-464; DOI: 10.2113/gssajg.111.4.462
© 2008 Geological Society of South Africa
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, A.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Discussion

Comments on the paper "Megacryst suites from the Lekkerfontein and Uintjiesberg kimberlites, southern Africa: evidence for a non-cognate origin"

A.E. Moore

Department of Geology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa. PAM Botswana (Pty) Limited, Box 66, Maun Botswana. e-mail: andy.moore@info.bw

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    Introduction
 
Zoned rims to garnets in sheared peridotites have been ascribed to reaction with the liquid that crystallized the megacryst suite (Griffin et al., 1989; Moore and Lock, 2001). To preserve such zoned margins, this magma must have been present immediately prior to, or at the time of kimberlite eruption (Griffin et al., 1989). This conclusion is supported by the isobaric range in megacryst equilibration temperatures in individual pipes (Gurney et al., 1979). It is also consistent with U/Pb ages for megacryst zircons, which typically span an interval from the time of emplacement of the host kimberlite to some 5–10Ma earlier (Moore et al., 2008). Megacrysts thus offer potential keys to understanding the significance of the sheared peridotites in terms of mantle composition and structure, as well as the processes involved in the generation of kimberlite magmas. Accordingly, the detailed characterization of the chemical signatures of populations from the Lekkerfontein and Uintjiesberg kimberlites (Merry and Le Roex, 2007) is a very welcome addition to the database of this important suite. Nevertheless, it highlights a persistent conundrum that must be addressed. REE modelling, using published partition coefficients for clinopyroxene and basaltic magma compositions argues against crystallization from the host kimberlite magma. However, this conflicts with field, petrographic, mineral chemistry and experimental data, summarized below, which appears to demand a cognate origin (e.g. Jakob, 1977; Eggler and Wendlandt, 1979; Kotrovitsky et al., 2004, Moore and Belousova, 2005 and Rankenberg et al. 2005.


    Evidence for a cognate origin for megacrysts
 
Field evidence
Magmas such as meimechites (Moore et . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of South Africa