Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
South African Journal of Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

South African Journal of Geology; December 2005; v. 108; no. 4; p. 578-579; DOI: 10.2113/108.4.578
© 2005 Geological Society of South Africa
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cole, D.I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Discussion

Discussion on "Aeolian and marine deposits of the Tabakbaai Quarry area, western Cape, South Africa" (South African Journal of Geology 107, 619–632)

D.I. Cole

Council for Geoscience, P.O. Box 572, Bellville, 7535 South Africa, E-mail: doug@geobell.org.za

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Franceschini and Compton (2004) have attempted to better constrain the age of the Late Cenozoic sediments west of Saldanha, given the widely differing results published by previous workers (Dale and McMillan, 1999; Roberts and Brink, 2002). However, their broad range of possible ages as determined on samples using strontium isotope analyses – 0 to 1.4 Ma (minimum range) and 1.7 to 5.9 Ma (maximum range) – (Table 1 Franceschini and Compton, 2004) limits any meaningful improvement of the chronostratigraphy, particularly since the sedimentary succession has a maximum reported time span of only 12 million years (Roberts and Brink, 2002). According to the authors, the poor age resolution is due to the marine Sr isotope curve flattening out in the late Miocene to Pliocene (between ~ 10 and 2 Ma), as well as to technical problems with the isotope apparatus at the University of Cape Town. Did the authors not consider the possibility of sending the samples to other institutions with Sr isotope facilities, in order to achieve more precise results?

A Mio-Pliocene age between ~ 4.9 and 5.9 Ma has been determined for the bulk of the sedimentary succession based upon the overlapping ranges of Sr-derived ages (Franceschini . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
South African Journal of GeologyHome page
T.A. Stidham
The importance of Diamantornis eggshell (Aves: Struthionidae) in the age and correlation of the Prospect Hill Formation, South Africa
South African Journal of Geology, December 1, 2008; 111(4): 459 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of South Africa