Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
South African Journal of Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

South African Journal of Geology; March 2009; v. 112; no. 1; p. 23-38; DOI: 10.2113/gssajg.112.1.23
© 2009 Geological Society of South Africa
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, A.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Type II diamonds: Flamboyant Megacrysts?

A.E. Moore

African Queen Mines Limited, Box 66 Maun, Botswana. Department of Geology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140, South Africa. e-mail: andy.moore{at}info.bw

Type II diamonds from Premier are characterised by light carbon isotope-enriched compositions, markedly different from the signatures of the associated Eclogitic (E-type) and Peridotitic (P-type) diamonds at the same locality. This provides strong evidence that these Type II stones represent a third and hitherto unrecognised diamond paragenesis. Their isotopic signature is closely similar to that of rare Orapa diamonds with websterite inclusions, arguing for a common paragenesis. The Orapa websterite garnet inclusions are Ti- and Cr-rich relative to those from other kimberlites, and overlap the compositional field for Orapa garnet megacrysts. These chemical characteristics, coupled with the large size and irregular shape of Type II diamonds, links them to the megacryst suite. This conclusion is supported by evidence which shows that at the low temperature range of megacryst crystallisation, the associated residual liquids, if buffered by mantle wall rocks, at oxygen fugacities between the WM and IW, would be in the diamond P-T-fO2 stability field. The low N concentrations and light cabon isotopic-enriched fingerprint of the Type II stones are consistent with their crystallisation from such evolved magmas. It is demonstrated that in addition to the irregular and often large (megacryst) Type II stones, there are two further suites of N-poor diamonds which can be assigned to either an eclogitic or peridotitic paragenesis on the basis of their inclusions, physical properties and carbon isotopic signatures.

Diamonds with complex growth zones and deformation textures can be explained in terms of dynamic mantle processes, linked to formation of the sheared peridotites, within the thermal aureole surrounding the kimberlite magma in which the megacryst suite crystallised. Framesites, fibrous cubic diamonds, and eclogitic diamonds which formed just prior to kimberlite eruption, can also be linked to the processes responsible for crystallisation of the megacryst suite, which is considered to be cognate to the host kimberlite magma.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of South Africa