Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
South African Journal of Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

South African Journal of Geology; September 2007; v. 110; no. 2-3; p. 339-348; DOI: 10.2113/gssajg.110.2-3.339
© 2007 Geological Society of South Africa
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Compton, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Maake, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Source of the suspended load of the upper Orange River, South Africa

John S. Compton and Livhuwani Maake

Department of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa, e-mail: john.compton{at}uct.ac.za; livhuwani.maake{at}goldfields.co.za

The Orange River is one of the World’s most turbid; delivering 60 million tons of sediment each year to the western margin of South Africa. Much of this sediment is believed to be from soil erosion, an increasing environmental threat to sustainability in southern Africa. This study focuses on the upper reaches of the Orange River above the Caledon River confluence, because it is here that high rainfall and topographic relief of the Drakensberg Mountains produce most of the Orange River’s suspended load. Comparison of grain size, mineralogy and geochemistry of the suspended sediment load with catchment bedrock soils provides an estimate of the source of the suspended sediment. Major and trace element ratios indicate that the suspended sediment load is primarily derived from Karoo (upper Beaufort and Stormberg groups) sedimentary rocks rather than Drakensberg basalt. The Caledon River carries the largest fine-mud suspended load primarily from the erosion of Karoo sedimentary rock soils. The organic carbon content of the suspended load ranges from 1.0 to 1.3 weight % with {delta}13C values that range from –19.7 to –16.9{per thousand} PDB. The {delta}13C values of the organic fraction of soils is highly variable (–21.5 to –12.7{per thousand} PDB) and reflect the mix of C3 and C4 vegetation in the catchment area.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
South African Journal of GeologyHome page
C. T. Herbert and J. S. Compton
Geochronology of Holocene sediments on the western margin of South Africa
South African Journal of Geology, September 1, 2007; 110(2-3): 327 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of South Africa