Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schröder, S. Articles by Beukes, N. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Stratigraphic and geochemical framework of the Agouron drill cores, Transvaal Supergroup (Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic, South Africa)

Paleoproterozoic Mineralization Research Group, Department of Geology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa, e-mail: sts{at}rau.ac.za

Juan Pablo Lacassie

Paleoproterozoic Mineralization Research Group, Department of Geology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa now at: Geological Survey of Chile, Santiago, Chile, e-mail: jlacassi{at}ing.uchile.cl

Nicolas J. Beukes

Paleoproterozoic Mineralization Research Group, Department of Geology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa, e-mail: njb{at}na.rau.ac.za

Two long drill cores through the Transvaal Supergroup (Neoarchean-Paleoproterozoic) record the vertical transition from a mixed siliciclastic-carbonate ramp (Schmidtsdrif Subgroup) through the Campbellrand-Malmani carbonate platform (Campbellrand Subgroup) to deeper-water banded iron formations (Asbestos Hills Subgroup). The cores were drilled in proximal (core GKF01) and distal (core GKP01) positions relative to the margin of the Campbellrand-Malmani carbonate platform. Correlation between cores is based on three types of marker horizons: sequence stratigraphic, volcanic/impact and lithologic markers. Several surfaces can be correlated to the platform succession. Gamma-ray data and bulk-rock XRF geochemistry of siliciclastic mudstones and tuff beds support the correlation.

Following flooding of a shallow-water carbonate ramp (Boomplaas Formation of Schmidtsdrif Subgroup), deposition of slope carbonates with minor siliciclastic mudstones, chert and banded iron formation (BIF) occurred below storm wave base. Cycles of in situ microbialites and reworked slope carbonates are prominent in both cores. A final transgressive pulse near the top of the succession led to deposition of thick cherts and iron formations across the former platform, slope and basinal areas.

Deposition on the slope was controlled by cementation potential in microbial facies and by sediment input, which in turn was linked to variations in platform margin geometry and changes in accommodation space. Results indicate preferred sediment accumulation in the proximal slope position, while chemical sediments were deposited preferentially beyond the reach of carbonate and siliciclastic detrital sediment. Similarly, sediment input and possibly early marine cementation influenced cycles of microbialites and reworked carbonates. Sequence stratigraphic analysis and siliciclastic mudstone geochemistry suggest a possible sea level fall and a change in provenance of the siliciclastic detritus at the transition from the Monteville Formation to the Nauga Formation (basal Campbellrand Subgroup). These changes were probably related to a major depositional hiatus on the platform.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. W. Fischer and A. H. Knoll An iron shuttle for deepwater silica in Late Archean and early Paleoproterozoic iron formation Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2009; 121(1-2): 222 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Y. Sumner and N. J. Beukes Sequence Stratigraphic Development of the Neoarchean Transvaal carbonate platform, Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa South African Journal of Geology, June 1, 2006; 109(1-2): 11 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]