Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sumner, D. Y. Articles by Beukes, N. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Sequence Stratigraphic Development of the Neoarchean Transvaal carbonate platform, Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa

Department of Geology, University of California, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA, e-mail: sumner{at}geology.ucdavis.edu

Nicolas J. Beukes

Department of Geology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, 2000 South Africa, e-mail: njb{at}na.rau.ac.za

The ~2.67 to ~2.46 Ga lower Transvaal Supergroup, South Africa, consists of a mixed siliciclastic-carbonate ramp that grades upward into an extensive carbonate platform, overlain by deep subtidal banded iron-formation. It is composed of 14 third-order sequences that develop from a mixed siliciclastic-carbonate ramp to a steepened margin followed by a rimmed margin that separated lagoonal environments from the open ocean. Drowning of the platform coincided with deposition of banded iron-formation across the Kaapvaal Craton. The geometry and stacking of these sequences are consistent with more recent patterns of carbonate accumulation, demonstrating that Neoarchean carbonate accumulation responded to subsidence, sea level change, and carbonate production similarly to Proterozoic and Phanerozoic platforms. The similarity of carbonate platform geometry through time, even with significant changes in dominant biota, demonstrates that rimmed margins are localized primarily by physiochemical conditions rather than growth dynamics of specific organisms.

Stratigraphic patterns during deposition of the Schmidtsdrift and Campbellrand-Malmani subgroups are most consistent with variable thinning of the Kaapvaal Craton during extrusion of the ~2.7 Ga Ventersdorp lavas. Although depositional patterns are consistent with rifting of the western margin of the Kaapvaal Craton during this time, a rift-to-drift transition is not required to explain subsidence. Heating and thinning during Ventersdorp time can produce the observed thermal subsidence from ~2.7 to ~2.45 Ga if the thermal diffusivity of the craton was moderately low.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Q. Guo, H. Strauss, A. J. Kaufman, S. Schroder, J. Gutzmer, B. Wing, M. A. Baker, A. Bekker, Q. Jin, S.-T. Kim, et al. Reconstructing Earth's surface oxidation across the Archean-Proterozoic transition Geology, May 1, 2009; 37(5): 399 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. W. Fischer and A. H. Knoll An iron shuttle for deepwater silica in Late Archean and early Paleoproterozoic iron formation Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2009; 121(1-2): 222 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Schroder, J. P. Lacassie, and N. J. Beukes Stratigraphic and geochemical framework of the Agouron drill cores, Transvaal Supergroup (Neoarchean-Paleoproterozoic, South Africa) South African Journal of Geology, June 1, 2006; 109(1-2): 23 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]