Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bordy, E. M. Articles by Rubidge, B. S. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Provenance study of the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic Elliot Formation, main Karoo Basin, South Africa

University of the Witwatersrand, School of Geosciences, Johannesburg, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa.

P. John Hancox and Bruce S. Rubidge

University of the Witwatersrand, School of Geosciences, Johannesburg, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa., e-mail: HancoxP{at}geosciences.wits.ac.za; rubidgeb{at}geosciences.wits.ac.za

Correspondence: Corresponding address: Department of Geology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140, South Africa, e-mail: e.bordy{at}ru.ac.za

Based on regional palaeocurrent pattern analysis and petrographic studies, the Late Triassic-Early Jurassic Elliot Formation (Karoo Supergroup, South Africa) is divisible into a Lower and an Upper Elliot Formation. Laterally, along a north-south section, the lower unit displays both changes in the sediment supply pattern and petrological composition, whereas the upper unit lacks significant petrological variations. A break in sedimentation took place after the deposition of the Lower Elliot Formation, and a regional subaerial unconformity is detected between the Lower and Upper Elliot formations. This unconformity is emphasized by marked differences in the sedimentological and palaeontological composition of the deposits below and above the surface. Prevailing northerly sediment supply patterns of the Lower Elliot Formation are replaced by mainly easterly-northeasterly transportation directions in the Upper Elliot Formation, trends which were mentioned, but not accounted for by earlier researchers of the Late Triassic-Early Jurassic Elliot Formation. Simultaneously with the reorganization of the sediment supply patterns, the origin of the sandstones also shifted from recycled-orogen provenance, to a transitional continental source situated between craton interior and basement uplift provenances. This paper presents the contrast in palaeocurrent trends and sandstone composition across this surface, and reports, for the first time, the basin-wide presence of outsized quartzite pebbles and boulders, sourced from the Cape Fold Belt.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. M. Bordy, P. J. Hancox, and B. S. Rubidge The contact of the Molteno and Elliot formations through the main Karoo Basin, South Africa: a second-order sequence boundary South African Journal of Geology, September 1, 2005; 108(3): 351 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.M. Bordy, P.J. Hancox, and B.S. Rubidge A Reply: Turner, B.R. and Thomson, K., Discussion on 'Basin development during deposition of the Elliot Formation (Late Triassic - Early Jurassic), Karoo Supergroup, South Africa' (South African Journal of Geology, 107, 397-412) South African Journal of Geology, September 1, 2005; 108(3): 454 - 461. [Full Text] [PDF]