Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
South African Journal of Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

South African Journal of Geology; September 2004; v. 107; no. 3; p. 397-412; DOI: 10.2113/107.3.397
© 2004 Geological Society of South Africa
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bordy, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rubidge, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Basin development during the deposition of the Elliot Formation (Late Triassic - Early Jurassic), Karoo Supergroup, South Africa

Emese M. Bordy, P. John Hancox and Bruce S. Rubidge

University of the Witwatersrand, School of Geosciences, Johannesburg, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa. e-mail: emese_bordy{at}yahoo.com; HancoxP{at}geosciences.wits.ac.za; rubidgeb{at}geosciences.wits.ac.za

The integrated results of a facies analysis and provenance study of the Late Triassic to Early Jurassic Elliot Formation (Karoo Supergroup) provide some new insights into the development of the main Karoo foreland system of South Africa. Based on changes in the fluvial style, palaeocurrent pattern, provenance, isopach trends and fossil content, a regional lithostratigraphic subdivision of the Elliot Formation is proposed. In addition, the boundary between the Lower and Upper Elliot formations appears to be a second order sequence boundary. This unconformity was probably generated by the last stage of orogenic loading of the Cape Fold Belt, which interrupted the overall, first order orogenic unloading of the system, suggesting that tectonically controlled flexural subsidence existed in the main Karoo Basin until at least the end of Triassic. The magnitude of this pre-Upper Elliot tectonic event is signified by the presence of outsized quartzite pebbles and boulders, believed to have originated in the Cape Fold Belt. A number of tectonic structures, e.g. pene-contemporaneous normal faults and large-scale convolute bedding, coupled to sandstones with basement uplift/craton interior provenance, and easterly palaeocurrent direction for the Upper Elliot Formation suggest that the first stages of inversion from a compressional to extensional tectonic regime began only in the Early Jurassic.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
R. J Butler, R. M.H Smith, and D. B Norman
A primitive ornithischian dinosaur from the Late Triassic of South Africa, and the early evolution and diversification of Ornithischia
Proc R Soc B, August 22, 2007; 274(1621): 2041 - 2046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
South African Journal of GeologyHome page
B. R. Turner and K. Thomson
Discussion on 'Basin development during deposition of the Elliot Formation (Late Triassic - Early Jurassic), Karoo Supergroup, South Africa' (South African Journal of Geology, 107, 397-12)
South African Journal of Geology, September 1, 2005; 108(3): 448 - 453.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of South Africa