Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (20) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Parman, S. W. Articles by de Wit, M. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A subduction origin for komatiites and cratonic lithospheric mantle

Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA, e-mail: parman{at}mit.edu, tlgrove{at}mit.edu, djdann{at}prodigy.net

Maarten J. de Wit

Department of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa, e-mail: maarten{at}cigces.uct.ac.za

We present a model in which the generation of komatiites in Archaean subduction zones produced depleted mantle residues that eventually formed the highly depleted portions of the Kaapvaal lithospheric mantle. The envisioned melting process is similar to that which has formed boninites in Phanerozoic subduction zones such as the Izu-Bonin-Mariana arc. The primary differences between the Archaean and Phanerozoic melting regimes are higher mean melting temperatures (1450 versus 1350 °C) and higher mean melting pressures (2.5 versus 1.5 GPa) for the komatiites. The komatiites from the Komati Formation in the Barberton greenstone belt are mafic enough to have produced the depletion seen in most Kaapvaal granular peridotite xenoliths. However, the most highly depleted Kaapvaal xenoliths require an even more Mg-rich magma than the Komati komatiites (Kk). Samples of boninite mantle residues from the fore-arc of the Marianas subduction zone are nearly as depleted as the Kaapvaal cratonic mantle, indicating that buoyant, craton-like mantle is being produced today. We speculate that production rates of cratonic mantle were greater in the Archaean due to the greater depth of melting for komatiites (relative to boninites) and greater worldwide arc length. The high production rates and high buoyancy of the komatiite mantle residues gave rise to the rapid growth and stabilization of the Kaapvaal craton in the Archaean.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Zeh, A. Gerdes, and J. M. Barton Jr Archean Accretion and Crustal Evolution of the Kalahari Craton--the Zircon Age and Hf Isotope Record of Granitic Rocks from Barberton/Swaziland to the Francistown Arc J. Petrology, May 11, 2009; (2009) egp027v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Stiegler, D. R. Lowe, and G. R. Byerly Abundant pyroclastic komatiitic volcanism in the 3.5-3.2 Ga Barberton greenstone belt, South Africa Geology, October 1, 2008; 36(10): 779 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.G. PEARSON and N. WITTIG Formation of Archaean continental lithosphere and its diamonds: the root of the problem Journal of the Geological Society, September 1, 2008; 165(5): 895 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. de Wit The Kalahari Epeirogeny and climate change: differentiating cause and effect from core to space South African Journal of Geology, September 1, 2007; 110(2-3): 367 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Shervais The significance of subduction-related accretionary complexes in early Earth processes Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 405(0): 173 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]