Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
South African Journal of Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

South African Journal of Geology; December 2001; v. 104; no. 4; p. 309-318; DOI: 10.2113/gssajg.104.4.309
© 2001 Geological Society of South Africa
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, C.
Right arrow Articles by de Waal, S.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Magmatic Ni-Cu versus PGE deposits: Contrasting genetic controls and exploration implications

Chusi Li

Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. e-mail: cli{at}indiana.edu

W. D. Maier

Centre for Research on Magmatic Ore Deposits, Department of Geology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa. e-mail: wdmaier{at}scientia.up.ac.za

S.A. de Waal

Centre for Research on Magmatic Ore Deposits, Department of Geology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa. e-mail: sadw{at}scientia.up.ac.za

Both Ni-Cu and PGE deposits are associated with mafic and ultramafic rocks, but the former often occur in dynamic magmatic systems such as lava channels and magma conduits whereas the later occur in larger layered intrusions. The contrasting modes of occurrence appear to be related to different degrees of preferential partitioning of the metals (PGE versus Cu and Ni) into segregating sulfide liquid and different concentration processes of the sulfide liquid during the formation of the ores.

Primary magmas derived from partial melting of the upper mantle are fertile in PGE, Ni and Cu only when the molten sulfides are completely dissolved in the magmas. This requires a high degree of partial melting of the mantle, perhaps higher than 30 percent. The partial melts usually have basaltic to komatiitic compositions, and are unlikely to achieve sulfide saturation during ascent to the crust. Fractional crystallization and crustal contamination are the most important processes known to have induced sulfide saturation in magma upon intrusion. Sulfide liquid segregated in a large chamber may achieve high R-factors required for the formation of reef-type PGE deposits. Crustal assimilation appears to be most effective in dynamic lava channels and magma conduits. A large volume of sulfide liquid segregated from magma in such dynamic environments often has a lower R-factor, and relatively lower metal concentrations. Such metal-poor sulfide liquid needs to be deposited in restricted localities, and/or to be upgraded in metals by reacting with new surges of magma, to become a Ni-Cu sulfide deposit.

Because of their extremely high partition coefficient between sulfide liquid and magma, PGE will become significantly depleted in magma even at small amounts of sulfide segregation. Copper, on the other hand, will be much less depleted because of its relatively low partition coefficient. Thus, Pd/Cu ratios in whole rocks can be used to detect PGE mineralization associated with small sulfide segregation in large layered intrusion. The whole rock Cu/Zr ratio is sensitive to large amounts of sulfide liquid segregation from magma and thus is a useful tool for Ni-Cu exploration. Nickel contents of olivine can also be used to identify Ni depletion in magma associated with large amounts of sulfide segregation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
A. Kerr and A. M. Leitch
Self-Destructive Sulfide Segregation Systems and the Formation of High-Grade Magmatic Ore Deposits
Economic Geology, March 1, 2005; 100(2): 311 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
C. Li, C. Li, W. D. Maier, and S. A. de Waal
THE ROLE OF MAGMA MIXING IN THE GENESIS OF PGE MINERALIZATION IN THE BUSHVELD COMPLEX: THERMODYNAMIC CALCULATIONS AND NEW INTERPRETATIONS--A REPLY
Economic Geology, May 1, 2002; 97(3): 667 - 667.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
South African Journal of GeologyHome page
W.D. Maier, S.-J. Barnes, and M. J. van der Merwe
Platinum-group elements in the Pyroxenite Marker, Bushveld Complex: implications for the formation of the Main Zone
South African Journal of Geology, December 1, 2001; 104(4): 301 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
South African Journal of GeologyHome page
W.D. Maier, J. Sliep, S.-J. Barnes, S.A. de Waal, and C. Li
PGE-bearing mafic-ultramafic sills in the floor of the eastern Bushveld Complex on the farms Blaauwboschkraal, Zwartkopje, and Waterval
South African Journal of Geology, December 1, 2001; 104(4): 343 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of South Africa