Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
South African Journal of Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

South African Journal of Geology; September 2001; v. 104; no. 3; p. 205-216; DOI: 10.2113/1040205
© 2001 Geological Society of South Africa
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bumby, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Maier, W.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

The stratigraphic relationship between the Waterberg and Soutpansberg Groups in Northern Province, South Africa: Evidence from the Blouberg area

A.J. Bumby, P.G. Eriksson, R. van der Merwe and W.D. Maier

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, Republic of South Africa. ABumby{at}postino.up.ac.za

The relative stratigraphic position of the mid-Proterozoic Waterberg and Soutpansberg Groups in Northern Province has long been a subject of debate. These two major Proterozoic groups are juxtaposed in the Blouberg area, although the nature of the contact between the two sedimentary units is generally regarded as being faulted along the southern strand of the Melinda Fault. The Blouberg area is also the type locality for yet another small mid-Proterozoic succession, that of the Blouberg Formation, which locally outcrops beneath both the Waterberg and Soutpansberg strata.

Existing maps of the Blouberg area show the Wyllie’s Poort Formation of the Soutpansberg Group to unconformably overlie rocks of the Blouberg Formation in the western foothills of Blouberg mountain. However, recent mapping suggests that these "Blouberg" strata themselves unconformably overlie the Blouberg Formation. This, therefore, raises important questions regarding the stratigraphic placement of these intermediate strata in the western foothills of Blouberg mountain, which outcrop unconformably above the Blouberg Formation and unconformably below the Wyllie’s Poort Formation. The intermediate strata are characterised by a thin basal conglomerate, consisting of cobbles of quartz, quartzite and B.I.F. This basal conglomerate grades vertically into trough cross-bedded sandstone and granulestone, which are characterised by heavy mineral concentrations on foresets.

Although this facies compares poorly with strata of the Mogalakwena Formation in adjacent areas, which are generally more conglomeratic, they are identical with strata from more distal outcrops of the Mogalakwena Formation further to the south-west Palaeocurrent directions recorded from the intermediate strata are unimodal towards the west-south-west, in common with those recorded from the Mogalakwena Formation. This suggests that the intermediate strata, unconformably overlain by the Wyllie’s Poort Formation of the Soutpansberg Group, can be correlated with strata of the Mogalakwena Formation. The Waterberg Group thus appears to pre-date the Soutpansberg rocks.

Additional evidence for the age relationships proposed here can be gained from an east-north-east-trending dyke swarm, which locally intrudes the basement, Blouberg and Waterberg rocks. This dyke swarm does not intrude Soutpansberg strata in adjacent areas. Patterns of spider diagrams of incompatible trace elements recorded from these dykes are very similar to those from the basaltic Sibasa Formation of the Soutpansberg Group. This suggests that the dyke swarm may have acted as feeders to the Sibasa lavas, and also suggests that the Soutpansberg Group post-dates the Waterberg Group.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
South African Journal of GeologyHome page
H.C. Dorland, N.J. Beukes, J. Gutzmer, D.A.D. Evans, and R.A. Armstrong
Precise SHRIMP U-Pb zircon age constraints on the lower Waterberg and Soutpansberg Groups, South Africa
South African Journal of Geology, June 1, 2006; 109(1-2): 139 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
South African Journal of GeologyHome page
R.E. Hanson, W.A. Gose, J.L. Crowley, J. Ramezani, S.A. Bowring, D.S. Bullen, R.P. Hall, J.A. Pancake, and J. Mukwakwami
Paleoproterozoic intraplate magmatism and basin development on the Kaapvaal Craton: Age, paleomagnetism and geochemistry of ~1.93 to ~1.87 Ga post-Waterberg dolerites
South African Journal of Geology, June 1, 2004; 107(1-2): 233 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
South African Journal of GeologyHome page
S. Kurszlaukis and W. P. Barnett
Volcanological and structural aspects of the Venetia kimberlite cluster - a case study of South African kimberlite maar-diatreme volcanoes
South African Journal of Geology, September 1, 2003; 106(2-3): 165 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of South Africa